16 July 2011

They're Certainly Behaving like a Cartel

When you use the word "cartel," most people think of one of two things:  those groups responsible for the trafficking of illegal drugs, or OPEC.  I still think of the latter, mainly because I first heard the word used in reference to them.  


Lately, some people--including a couple who have left comments on my posts-- have referred to higher education, or the education system generally, as a cartel.  While it may not apply to pre-college education, as most local school systems and K-12 schools have no competition, it may well apply to colleges and universities.  After all, post-secondary institutions that ostensibly compete with each other actually consult with each other, and with governments and various professional associations, to decide on who can and can't enter various professions, or who can go to law school or other professional schools.


Another image that people have of cartels is one of violence. Those groups use not only physical violence and extortion, but also other forms of intimidation, to cow people into not bearing witness against them.  


The educational and professional cartels, like their counterparts in other endeavors, want to keep their monopoly on keys to the gateway, if you will.  And, just as cartels react ruthlessly to anyone who stands up to them or is otherwise "bad for business, so will members of the higher-education cartel.


Over the past couple of days, I've been reading about an example of what I've just described.  The Thomas Cooley Law School has been described by various people in the legal profession as well as scambloggers as the worst law school in the United States.  The U.S. News And World Report, in its annual ratings of colleges, universities and graduate and professional schools, consigned TCLS to the fourth, or bottom, tier of American Law Schools.


In retaliation, the school has started a lawsuit against four bloggers who, supposedly, defamed it.  C. Cryn Johannsen mentioned the suit in one of her blogs; the authors of Lawyers Against the Law School Scam and Restoring Dignity to the Law also mention it, and the chilling effect it could have if it's carried out.   Cryn and "Lawyers" expressed concern that they, too, could become objects of such a suit;
Restoring Dignity seems not to have much concern because he (she?) is more confident that Cooley was over-reaching in this case.



Still, even he/she expressed concern.  And, isn't that one purpose of a cartel:  to manipulate people through fear.

4 comments:

  1. Did you see the New York Times piece on law schools yesterday? http://www.nytimes.com/2011/07/17/business/law-school-economics-job-market-weakens-tuition-rises.html?_r=1&hp

    ReplyDelete
  2. check out my review of David Segal's NYT article

    http://daisnaid9.blogspot.com/2011/07/more-bad-publicity-for-law-school-scam.html

    ReplyDelete
  3. According to "RockStar05," Thomas M. Cooley Law School did not even bother to contact him via email or a blog comment. They could have asked him to alter, delete, amend or remove the post (for a valid reason). Instead, they apparently chose to play hardball with a broke, third year law student.

    If this suit names him, it will certainly ruin his chances at taking the bar, let alone finding a legal job. (Surely, Cooley is aware of this situation. Yet, they are pursuing this option.) Also, according to "RockStar05," his blog receives about 30 daily views.

    http://qfora.com/jdu/thread.php?threadId=18891#post266764

    "Finally, I would like to add that Cooley has not attempted to contact me even once, either through e-mail or through a blog comment on this post. If they had done so as they claim in James B. Thelan's sworn affidavit as attached to the Complaint, or perhaps even are willing to retract their lawsuit at this early stage, I would consider removing this post altogether."

    ReplyDelete
  4. Anon and turde: Thanks for pointing out the Times article.

    Nando: They really are behaving like a cartel, aren't they? I don't know much about the law, at least as it applies to these situations. But I should think that Cooley would be expected to contact "Rockstar" and whoever else is involved before starting legal actions.

    ReplyDelete