30 September 2011

Really Bad Reasons To Go To Graduate School

Today I am going to do something that will probably upset some of you:  I'm going to appropriate an idea from what "LawProf" posted today.


He wrote about "bad reasons for going to law school."  Most of the reasons he gives, in one way or another, apply to going to graduate school in almost any field that's not STEM.  Unfortunately, they also seem to be the chief reasons why new or recent graduates go to grad or law school.


Here are some of the worst reasons to go to graduate school, especially in the humanities or non-quantitative social sciences, listed in no particular order:



  • I can't get a job with my BA in English, History, Philosophy, Sociology, Political Science or fill-in-the-blank.
If you can't get a job with a bachelor's in one of those fields, what makes you think you're going to get one with a master's or PhD in it?  Today, with the Internet, there's no excuse for not knowing about what the dismal prospects are for people with advanced degrees in that field.


  • My advisor says I'm the best student he's seen in years and that I could make "major contributions" to my field.
Well, guess what, sweetie.  Every adjunct instructor was told the same thing at some time or another in his or her academic career.  So, for that matter, have any number of baristas and waitresses.  Oh, yeah, I know a couple of cab drivers who were told the same thing.



  • Well, I know there aren't a lot of jobs in the field.  But I only have to get one of them.
Believe it or not, a PhD student I met actually said that.  My dear, you also have a billion-to-one chance (or whatever it is) of winning the Lotto jackpot.  But you only have to win it once.

  • And I'll be the one to get that job.
If you have such great powers of prediction, you should be picking stocks or something.


  • At least I won't have to start paying off my undergraduate loans.
A tumor doesn't shrink when you leave it alone or ignore it.  It doesn't become easier to treat if you wait three, seven or ten years.  Think of a debt as a tumor.  I wish I had.

  • They can never take your education away from you.
True enough.   But unused education tends to make people depressed and bitter.  Just think of all of those Ivy League housewives in the 1950's who self-medicated with alcohol and painkillers.  Or--take a look at almost any underemployed person you've ever met.  They make me think of what Caliban says to Prospero:  "You have given me language/And the profit on't is, I can curse."

  • No one in my family/community has ever done it before.
And not one of them has six-figure debt, either, unless he or she is a compulsive gambler, philanderer or drug addict--or just monumentally stupid.  Plus, that person has more time for family, friends and almost anything else he or she cares about than you will if you go to graduate school and have to work multiple jobs to pay it off. 

On top of everything, they have, or will have, better pensions than you ever will if you go to graduate school--that is, if you get a pension.


  • I want to make a difference in some young person's life.
There are plenty of other ways to do that.  If you really want to teach, why not teach in a public school system?  Even many religious and other private schools pay better, and offer better benefits, than colleges pay to all except the endowed professorships.  


Plus, you'll make far more of a difference by working with some young person before, rather than once, he or she goes to college.  I think about that every time I'm grading college students' papers and finding mistakes I learned not to make when I was in fourth grade.


If you want to "make a difference", here's an even better idea:  Get yourself a good job and do some volunteer work.  Then, at least, the people you try to help and the people who are helping you do it will be grateful to you.  That's more than can be said for all of those self-absorbed kids whose parents dumped them in college because they're unemployable and otherwise unmotivated.  Actually, it's also more than can be said for the parents, who think it's your job to give their kids good grades, no matter how little or how poor work they do.



  • I am passionate about (Subject X) and want to devote my life to researching and writing about it.
Ah, we should all be so fortunate. If you go to graduate school, you probably won't get to decide on the topic of your thesis or dissertation:  It is likely to be shaped by the research interests of your professors.  Why do you think some of your professors specialized in things that you simply couldn't imagine anyone having any interest in?  

Also: If you are so passionate about a subject, why can't you research it yourself?  If it doesn't require special equipment or facilities, as most STEM subjects do, you don't need an institution that supports what you do.  Read, find other people who share similar interests, start a blog and write, write, write.  I say that if you can't write about it in a way that would interest your local bus driver or mail carrier, what's the point in doing it?

Part of the problem, as I've said in previous posts, is that the educational cartel teaches people to distrust themselves and to believe that they are incapable of independent thought.  It instills the fear of making mistakes and failing; there is nothing a person with more schooling than intelligence fears more than being embarrassed, which is to say, than suffering a blow to his or her ego. Don't worry, you'll get over it:  When they try to make you feel foolish, they're only showing how insecure they are themselves.  Don't let that get in the way of learning!

That brings me to one more reason:

  • If I don't do it, I'm a failure.
To whom?  Where is the failure in understanding that you need to change course and move in a different direction?  I'll tell you:  The failure is in not acting upon such a realization.  

If any of you think of other reasons, please post them!   


Also:  Check out what Professor William Pannapacker, a.k.a., Thomas H Benton, has written on the subject.


8 comments:

  1. i've loved all your posts so far, but this may be the best. especially the student loan/tumor analogy. i'm glad i decided not to enroll in grad school a couple years ago. i have lots of desire to continue learning, but no desire for more formal education. i enjoy it and retain it more when it's self-directed.

    ReplyDelete
  2. Ah, if only I had dismissed these very reasons before I went to law school. Sadly, every person believes they are special in college (professors like to tell kids this) and that the education lottery will be theirs for the taking.

    I think there is another terrible reason and that is family pushing you to get more education especially if they didn't.

    ReplyDelete
  3. At this point in market oversaturation, advances in technology and software, outsourcing, offshoring, Chinese mass production, one-sided trade agreements, lack of tairiffs, corporate control, avarice, etc., even a graduate degree in STEM fields does not guarantee anything. I knew a Harvard biology major who ended up working in a grocery store - and living in a dump.

    U.S.-based companies are now looking to China and Sri Lanki to develop weapons systems, medical products, etc. How many American chemistry PhDs are struggling to find work?

    ReplyDelete
  4. STEM majors are also feeling the effects of outsourcing, offshoring, and advances in technology and software. No academic field is immune from the effects of the changing economy.

    ReplyDelete
  5. One of my grad school profs encouraged me to get a Ph.D. My gut said no way, and I'm happy I listened.

    ReplyDelete
  6. This is not at all aimed at this blog, I really do love this blog, but I am really getting sick and tired of reading article after article claiming that STEM degrees are some sort of gravy train. They are spreading a myth.

    There are differences with STEM degrees. For starters, STEM jobs are usually very specialized with skills that take time to learn, so if there is a particular job shortage, not just any STEM graduate will do, there is a job shortage because the employer is looking for a very narrow set of skills for a particular job. Whereas something like business in theory, management is seen as more of a broad skill, and supposedly a good manager could manage anything. STEM jobs are not as flexible and are not as easily interchangeable.

    Related to the specialization of STEM jobs, is that there is a wide variation of employment opportunities for STEM graduates. I happen to live in an area that has very few STEM jobs to begin with. It seems like STEM jobs are more concentrated toward urban areas, while most rural areas instead have jobs that correspond with agriculture, restaurants, auto shops, schools, field offices. Now if a rural area does have a plant that needs STEM graduates, then I can see there being a shortage because there is not enough of a nearby pool of specialized talent without STEM graduates moving there on purpose.
    But that leads to the third problem, is that a lot of the STEM opportunities are of a short-term temporary nature. I keep hearing that successful experienced engineers have so much STEM work available to them that they are doing contract work on the side. A key point is that they are being offered contract work. That is what companies want to offer right now, is one project at a time to someone, because there is huge flux in demand, either feast or famine. Try being a new STEM graduate going after a few hours of contract work at a time piecemealed likely without whatever is considered the right kind of experience that a company is looking for, and especially try to do this if one does not already live where the contract work is being offered.

    It is to the advantage of a company to simply find several engineers that are already experienced in what they are looking for, spread the hours out among those experienced engineers as contract work on the side, rather than have to deal with an inexperienced recent STEM graduate who needs full time steady employment to get started.

    Then yes there is the fancy specialized technology that is obsolete soon after a graduate enters the workforce. I can see if the graduates have exposure to just the right kind of fancy technology and trendy techniques in school that they would get multiple job offers, but there is a roll of dice luck in having what an employer is looking for. It would not surprise me if a few lucky STEM graduates that have exactly what employers are looking for get multiple offers, while an equally smart STEM graduate with not quite the right experience gets zip when it comes to offers.

    I know I have grossly over generalized, but there are factors that make STEM degrees different that are being ignored, STEM jobs are narrowly specialized, unevenly spread out across the country, there are short burst of opportunities, and technology can go obsolete quickly.

    I believe that the pundits are too afraid to consider that they are factors that causes STEM job shortages that have nothing to do with the total number of STEM degrees, because then they might have to consider that they can’t simply blame the graduate for taking the wrong degrees, if recent graduates of all degrees are being screwed.

    ReplyDelete
  7. Nando and Soapbox: I am glad you mentioned the STEM situation. I have done a bit of net-surfing and found that, indeed, STEM graduates are feeling the effects of this economy. In an irony that you, Nando, can appreciate, some are actually going to law school!

    That said, as bad as the STEM situation is, it still might be better than that of law or other graduate programs. At least, the situation in academia, if not in industry, is better. Plus, it seems that people who go into STEM have more clearly defined their reasons for doing so than many who go for graduate degrees in the humanities, or in law. People don't try to "salvage" their "useless" undergraduate degrees by going to graduate school in engineering or physics, for example.

    To everyone else: I'm glad you didn't drink the Kool-Aid. One good thing about being an adjunct again is that I'm not going to have students asking me to write letters of recommendation for their graduate school applications. And, I'm hoping to be out of the academic world altogether in two years, in part so that I will no longer have to be part of a system that exploits people by fueling unrealistic hopes--for the starry-eyed undergraduates who fantasize about "the life of the mind" and for adjuncts who think (as I did for too long) that if they "stick it out" for another semester, another year, another two years, they will grab that golden ring of a tenure-track job. With all the money we spent getting our degrees, sending out resumes, and going on interviews and conferences, we could just as well have gone to Vegas or Atlantic City, or just bought Lotto tickets.

    ReplyDelete
  8. Here's another reason:

    It'll look good on a resume / it'll make me employable.

    -- Not necessarily, especially if you did it because you couldn't think of anything else to do and now that you're done, you don't know what to do with it.

    Love your blog!

    ReplyDelete